[TRANS] 130724 [C-JeS] Our Official Statement Regarding The FTC’s Verdict Of SM Entertainment’s Interference

C-JeS Entertainment’s statement on the rectification order made by the FTC on SM Entertainment-KFPCAI for interfering with JYJ’s activities as singers is as follows. (Official statement by CEO Baek Chang Joo)

We would like to thank the FTC for conducting such a transparent investigation for the past three years to eradicate unlawful actions in the industry, collecting evidence of SM Entertainment and principal agents in the culture industry, such as the Korean Federation of Pop Culture and Arts Industries (KFPCAI), unilaterally and systematically interfering with JYJ’s broadcasted appearances.

The investigation gave irrefutable evidence that SM Entertainment had violated the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act by abusing their monopolistic and superior leverage in the entertainment industry to disadvantage those who have different opinions multiple times. We believe that the FTC’s recent order to rectify such actions will shed light on the tyranny of super powers in the industry who go against the innovative economy policies of the current government.

The development of our nation’s entertainment industry, signified by the Hallyu Wave, will only take place if the creativity and diversity of every participant is respected and guaranteed. This means that we must no longer be swept up in the despotism of the few super powers in the industry. If the Hallyu Wave develops henceforth on the basis of a lawful mould, starting with today’s rectification order, we believe that this will be an opportunity for it to leap forth into the world again.

Although JYJ’s legal dispute with their former agency was concluded in April, JYJ still suffered from unlawful external pressure. Including the unilateral notification they received from their album distribution company recently, it is an undeniable fact that JYJ have unlawfully been restricted from appearing on music programs, even when they release albums. This is an embarrassing truth in our society today. But if policies and institutions continue to be the foundation of change, as they were today, we believe that JYJ will be able to perform on a fair stage in the future.

JYJ’s stance on the verdict is as follows.

“We would like to thank the FTC for their decision. Though it feels as though we have been locked in a hard battle since 2009 and are walking in an endless desert, today’s verdict gave us strength to keep going as it showed that the situation is slowly changing for the better. We hope that the FTC’s verdict will allow us to freely pursue activities in the entertainment industry and stand on a fair stage in front of the public. We also hope that such roads are also opened for our juniors as well.

Although a long and dark tunnel still lies ahead of us, we saw a strand of light in the far distance flash by our eyes. We will continue to walk towards that light, and we will always do our best to repay everyone with great performances and activities.”

<Reference-1 – Information relating to JYJ’s legal dispute and the FTC’s announcement>
On July 31st, 2009, the three members of JYJ claimed that their exclusive contract with SM Entertainment was no longer valid due to unlawful clauses including an extremely long contract period (13 years) that went against the social rules, an extremely biased income distribution that favored the agency, and no freedom with regards to activities during the contract period. Thus, they submitted an injunction to the Seoul District Courts to nullify the validity of their contract and on October 29th, 2009, the Seoul District Courts accepted the trio’s case and their exclusive contract nullification injunction (Seoul District Courts 2009Ka-Hap2869). Since then, the Courts have reconfirmed multiple times through multiple legal disputes between the two parties that their unilateral and forced exclusive contract was no longer valid.

In October of 2012, the FTC announced their new ‘Model standards for business transactions between entertainment management companies, celebrities (and trainees) and production companies’, which was intended to facilitate a fair working environment in the entertainment management business. Since then, entertainment agencies and the awareness of those working in the industry have changed, ensuring legal protection for those newly entering the industry, and providing a stable ground for rookies to pursue activities with no limitations. Today’s announcement by the FTC regarding the unlawful business transaction between JYJ and their former agency has proved that the two parties’ legal dispute has helped eradicate unlawful actions taking place and has become a stepping stone in creating a groundbreaking change in the industry.

<Reference-2 / 2012 November: The end of JYJ – SM Entertainment’s legal dispute>
On July 31st, 2009, the three members of JYJ claimed that their exclusive contract with SM Entertainment was no longer valid due to unlawful clauses including an extremely long contract period (13 years), an extremely biased income distribution that favored the agency, and no freedom with regards to activities during the contract period. Thus, they submitted an injunction to the Seoul District Courts to nullify the validity of their contract and on October 29th, 2009, the 50th Civil Suit Division (Judge Park Byung Dae) of the Seoul District Courts accepted the trio’s case and their exclusive contract nullification injunction (Seoul District Courts 2009KaHap2869). SM Entertainment submitted an appeal against the aforementioned verdict on April 12th, 2010 but was dismissed by the 50th Civil Suit Division (Judge Choi Sung Joon) of the Seoul District Courts on February 15th, 2011. This reconfirmed that the exclusive contract between the trio and SM Entertainment was unlawful, therefore invalid, and the verdict was made that the original verdict would stand. (Seoul District Courts 2010Ka-Hap1245). On February 21st, 2011, the 51st Civil Suit Division (Judge Kim Dae Woong) of the Seoul District Courts came to the verdict that SM Entertainment had been interfering with the trio’s activities in the entertainment industry, which including appearing on broadcasted programs, and ordered the agency not to interfere any more, as well as pay a 20 million Won fine for every instance they are caught violating this verdict henceforth (2010Ta-Gi4495).

Through a voluntary arbitration, in which it was decided that the exclusive contract between the two parties had ended on July 31st, 2009, JYJ became independent from SM Entertainment and were guaranteed the freedom to pursue any and all activities. This concluded the legal dispute between the two parties.

Source: [C-JeS Official Homepage]

Translated & Shared by: dongbangdata.net

JYJFantalk Source: dongbangdata.net

Share This

Translation 110518 JYJ Request An Apology From KBS…

Translation 110518 JYJ Request An Apology From KBS “Did We Ever Cause Problems In Society?”
C-JeS Entertainment has released an official position refuting the stance released by KBS on the 18th.

Through the official statement, CEO Baek Chang Joo of C-JeS Entertainment stated, “Regarding the lawsuit that KBS has deemed an issue, the Courts laid down the verdict that SM’s subordinate contract is one-sided and unjust last year, deeming it no longer valid.”

He continued to state, “Also, in February, the Courts recognized that SM was interfering with JYJ’s activities, leading to a strict order being laid down upon them. Therefore, KBS’ claim does not make sense as its statements are not in accordance with each other.“

He also added, “A verdict was made that SM must no longer interfere with the activities JYJ pursue with C-JeS under their contract,” and “These artistes are fighting a lonely battle against a prominent entertainment agency for the sole purpose of gaining a just contract.“

CEO Baek stated, “We believe it is not right for KBS, instead of maintaining an objective stance on the issue, to express its official position in a way that suggests that JYJ have caused problems in society to the public, who do not know much of the issue. Therefore, we request that KBS rectify their errors.”

Lastly, CEO Baek said, “Recently, JYJ have been chosen as honorary ambassadors for publicity projects led by the nation and various groups and have been enhancing national prestige. Therefore, it saddens us to see that others are claiming that JYJ are disrupting the order of the cultural industry.”

Source: [tv daily]
Translated & Shared by: dongbangdata.net
Momma’s Source: sharingyoochun.net

Interestingly, this account of the trial…

Interestingly, this account of the trial seems SM biased while the previous account of the trial seems JYJ biased. Where is the objective observer? Momma Cha

[Trans] 110315 4th Trial Of SM Vs JYJ.. SM Treasurer Appears As A Witness
The Fourth Trial of the Lawsuit between JYJ and SM Entertainment took place on the 15th.

Last April, SM filed an exclusive contract validity verification and compensation for losses lawsuit against the trio to which the trio filed an exclusive contract invalidity verfication and unjust profit restitution counter-lawsuit against SM. On the 15th, the two sides held a hearing.

The trial that was held this day included an examination of a witness, Mr Yoon, who was in charge of handling TVXQ’s income and accounts in SM Entertainment.At the trial, Mr Yoon stated, “SM artistes settle their accounts twice a year for the income from overseas and domestic activities and album sales. Before the accounts are settled and the artistes are paid, the celebrity, his or her manager, the treasurer and his or her parents get together, make sure that the income division is done exactly according to the contract and sign a paper stating that the correct income division was carried out. This information is also looked over by an accounting firm.”

He continued to state that TVXQ’s income division was done through a legal and just process as he said, “The trio have never voiced a complaint about the income division till now. The income division has always been done according to the contract with consent from the trio, and we have never omitted any profits or expenses.”

Also, Mr. Yoon explained the process behind TVXQ’s income division as well as the members’ expenses, income and salary received in advance. He also gave thorough answers to the questions given by the lawyers of SM and the trio regarding album sales and royalties.

The trio did not attend the trial. The next trial will be held on April 19th at the same location and the Courts are planning to hold an examination on another witness, Nam So Young, the CEO of SM Japan who was in charge of TVXQ’s Japanese activities.

source: [spn edaily+Yuaerubi]
translation credits: jeeelim5@tohosomnia.net
shared by: tohosomnia.net
Do not remove/add on any credits

Share this:

While it has been conjectured that JYJ’…

While it has been conjectured that JYJ’s Jaejoong, Junsu, and Yoochun may have left SM Entertainment over a dispute about Crebeau Cosmetics Company–the courts have ruled that this is not the case. As in the article below, SM’s assertion that Crebeau was the impetus that pulled JYJ out of the company has been nullified and Crebeau has filed a countersuit for harassment. Good Job, Crebeau. Momma Cha

[News] 110218 Court Judged That Crebeau Was Not Responsible to The Cause of TVXQ’s Breakup

Court has ruled that Crebeau, the cosmetic company which has been blamed for the breakup of TVXQ is indeed innocence.

In July 2009 TVXQ 3 members now formed JYJ filed an injunction application in Seoul Central District Court against their former agency SM Entertainment to terminate their exclusive contract, which SM then released an official statement pointing Crebeau as one which was responsible to the cause of lawsuit and the three members were tempted by financial issue from the cosmetic business, however after futher investigations Court has revealed that Crebeau is clearly not guilty.

Upon the accusation, Crebeau responded by accusing that it was only SM’s attempt to conceal their internal problems with their artists, thus created a misleading public opinion that could deflect fans’ criticisms by pointing other party as the culprit. Crebeau also took legal action against SM due to defamation of the company.

After reviewing the case since December last year, Court finally concluded that the accusation to Crebeau was indeed a wrong alarm for there were not enough evidences and called the case to an end.

Meanwhile Crebeau has been sponsoring Superstar K’s Woo Eun-mi, and also supported JYJ and Woo Eun-mi’s broadcasting activities.


credit: News Nate
trans: sharingyoochun.net

Source: +sharingyoochun.net